To obtain accurate results in numerical computation, high-precision arithmetic is a straightforward approach. However, most processors lack hardware support for floating-point formats beyond double precision (FP64). Double-word arithmetic (Dekker 1971) extends precision by using standard floating-point operations to represent numbers with twice the mantissa length. Building on this concept, various multi-word arithmetic methods have been proposed to further increase precision by combining additional words. Simplified variants, known as quasi algorithms, have also been introduced, which trade a certain loss of accuracy for reduced computational cost. In this study, we investigate the performance of quasi algorithms for double- and triple-word arithmetic in sparse iterative solvers based on the Conjugate Gradient method, and compare them with both non-quasi algorithms and standard FP64. We evaluate execution time on an x86 processor, the number of iterations to convergence, and solution accuracy. Although quasi algorithms require appropriate normalization to preserve accuracy - without it, convergence cannot be achieved - they can still reduce runtime when normalization is applied correctly, while maintaining accuracy comparable to full multi-word algorithms. In particular, quasi triple-word arithmetic can yield more accurate solutions without significantly increasing execution time relative to double-word arithmetic and its quasi variant. Furthermore, for certain problems, a reduction in iteration count contributes to additional speedup. Thus, quasi triple-word arithmetic can serve as a compelling alternative to conventional double-word arithmetic in sparse iterative solvers.

翻译：暂无翻译