In real-world scenarios, individuals often cooperate for mutual benefit. However, differences in wealth can lead to varying outcomes for similar actions. In complex social networks, individuals' choices are also influenced by their neighbors. To explore the evolution of strategies in realistic settings, we conducted repeated asymmetric prisoners dilemma experiments on a weighted BA scale-free network. Our analysis highlighted how the four components of memory-one strategies affect win rates, found two special strategies in the evolutionary process, and increased the cooperation levels among individuals. These findings offer practical insights for addressing real-world problems.

翻译：暂无翻译