Rankings are a type of preference elicitation that arise in experiments where assessors arrange items, for example, in decreasing order of utility. Orderings of n items labelled {1,...,n} denoted are permutations that reflect strict preferences. For a number of reasons, strict preferences can be unrealistic assumptions for real data. For example, when items share common traits it may be reasonable to attribute them equal ranks. Also, there can be different importance attributions to decisions that form the ranking. In a situation with, for example, a large number of items, an assessor may wish to rank at top a certain number items; to rank other items at the bottom and to express indifference to all others. In addition, when aggregating opinions, a judging body might be decisive about some parts of the rank but ambiguous for others. In this paper we extend the well-known Mallows (Mallows, 1957) model (MM) to accommodate item indifference, a phenomenon that can be in place for a variety of reasons, such as those above mentioned.The underlying grouping of similar items motivates the proposed Clustered Mallows Model (CMM). The CMM can be interpreted as a Mallows distribution for tied ranks where ties are learned from the data. The CMM provides the flexibility to combine strict and indifferent relations, achieving a simpler and robust representation of rank collections in the form of ordered clusters. Bayesian inference for the CMM is in the class of doubly-intractable problems since the model's normalisation constant is not available in closed form. We overcome this challenge by sampling from the posterior with a version of the exchange algorithm \citep{murray2006}. Real data analysis of food preferences and results of Formula 1 races are presented, illustrating the CMM in practical situations.

翻译：暂无翻译