O the third version of this response-paper to Imamura criticism, we recall that NonStandard Neutrosophic Logic was never used by neutrosophic community in no application, that the quarter of century old neutrosophic operators (1995) criticized by Imamura were never utilized since they were improved shortly after but he omits to tell their development, and that in real world applications we need to convert/approximate the NonStandard Analysis hyperreals, monads and binads to tiny intervals with the desired accuracy, otherwise they would be inapplicable. We point out several errors and false statements by Imamura with respect to the inf/sup of nonstandard subsets, also Imamura 'rigorous definition of neutrosophic logic' is wrong and the same for his definition of nonstandard unit interval, and we prove that there is not a total order on the set of hyperreals (because of the newly introduced Neutrosophic Hyperreals that are indeterminate), whence the transfer principle is questionable.

翻译：对伊玛目拉批评的第三版答复文件第三版,我们回顾,非标准神经神经系统逻辑从未被中微系统社区使用过,被伊玛目拉批评的四分之一世纪旧的中微系统操作员(1995年)从未被使用过,因为他们不久后就得到了改进,但他却忽略了他们的发展,在现实世界应用中,我们需要将非标准分析超现实、月球和双轨转换到极小的间隔,达到预期的准确度,否则将不适用。我们指出伊玛目拉关于非标准子集的内分集/上升的一些错误和虚假陈述,还有伊玛目拉“对中微系统逻辑的严格定义”是错误的,非标准单位间隔的定义也是如此,而且我们证明,在超真实的一套超现实(因为新引进的中微系统超正数是不确定的)方面,没有完全的秩序,因此转移原则是值得怀疑的。